دانلود رایگان مقاله لاتین مدل سازی بر اساس موردی از دروغگوی و راستگوی از سایت الزویر
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
مدل سازی مبتنی بر موردی از دروغگویان فراوان و راستگویان ثابت قدم: چه کسانی خود گزارشگران درستی و نادرستی هستند؟
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth-tellers: Who are the dishonesty and honesty self-reporters?
سال انتشار : 2016
برای دانلود رایگان مقاله مدل سازی بر اساس موردی از دروغگوی و راستگوی اینجا کلیک نمایید.
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی:
2. Case-based model of big-liars and truth-tellers
Fig. 1 is a visual summary of a configurational theory of complex antecedent conditions leading to big-liars and four types of individuals. The Venn diagrams in Fig. 1 suggest the adoption of the perspective of configurational influence on outcome conditions. The arrows in Fig. 1 illustrate five of six principal propositions in the theory. P1a: SES recipes by themselves are sufficient in identifying big-liars with high consistency. P1b: Constructing separate configurations of SES conditions having high consistency in indicating big-liars for separate samples of cases supports high cross-validity. P2: SES recipes by themselves are sufficient in identifying cases with high prosocial behavior. P3: SES recipes by themselves are sufficient in identifying cases high in antisocial behavior. P4: A high antisocial behavior recipe by itself is sufficient for identifying cases of big-liars. P5: A high prosocial behavior recipe by itself is suffi- cient for identifying self-report non-liars. P6: Configurations of SES along with pro- and antisocial behavior are necessary to construct recipes to identify big-liars and cases of the four types of lying. P6 stands in conflict with the first five propositions. P6 implies that the first five propositions are insufficient in identifying big-liars and individuals representing each of the four combination of lying/truth-telling and pro- and antisocial behaviors. P6 implies that including both SES and socially-related behavior are necessary. The study considers opposing views rather than advocating one perspective necessary for identifying big-liars. While advocacy hypothesis construction and testing is the current dominant logic, the study adopts a multiple (competing) hypotheses stance rather than an advocacy hypothesis stance as Armstrong (1979) recommends. P7: Asymmetric models identifying truth-tellers are not the mirror opposite of models identifying big-liars. P7 builds from the complexity theory principle that the causal conditions resulting in favorable outcomes include some ingredients that are not found in the causal conditions resulting in unfavorable outcomes (Hsiao, Jaw, Huan, & Woodside, 2015). P7 is an adoption at the human case level of Weick's (1987) highly reliable organization (HRO) proposition that the study of failure is distinct from the study of successful enterprise operations. P8 proposes four two-conditional outcomes: big-liars who believe everyone lies (i.e., “rounders”), big-liars who believe most others are honest (i.e., “confessors”), truth-tellers who believe most others are big-liars (i.e., “skeptics”), and truth-tellers who believe that most others are honest (i.e., “innocents”). P8: Unique configurations of SES characteristics and social behaviors indicate each of the four personal-world belief outcomes.
برای دانلود رایگان مقاله مدل سازی بر اساس موردی از دروغگوی و راستگوی اینجا کلیک نمایید.
کلمات کلیدی:
Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve - Vrij ... onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/1355325041719356/abstract by A Vrij - 2004 - Cited by 285 - Related articles Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve ... such as police officers, are generally rather poor at distinguishing between truths and lies. [PDF]Wells Fargo - Harvard University https://scholar.harvard.edu/.../wells_fargo_where_did_they_go_wrong_by_james_ve... Woodside, A., & Sharma, M. (2016). Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth- tellers: Who are the dishonesty and honesty self-reporters? Journal ... recipes - 首页 en.ustc.findplus.cn/?h=search_list&query=DE:%22recipes%22 Translate this page Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth-tellers: Who are the dishonesty and honesty self-reporters? Academic Journal. 作者: Woodside, A.G.1 ... Academic OneFile - Results - Author ("Arch G. Woodside") - Gale go.galegroup.com/ps//advancedSearch.do?method=doSearch...AU... Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth-tellers: Who are the ... dominant logic of symmetric-variable to asymmetric-case-based theory and testing. Altmetrics - Top Rated Articles - Elsevier https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-research/altmetric-articles It is based on the amount of activity from Twitter, Facebook, science blogs, ... Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth-tellers: Who are the ... Math Forum: Ask Dr. Math FAQ: Liars and Truthtellers - The Math Forum mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.liar.html Members of one tribe always tell the truth, and members of the other tribe always lie. The princess ... If we ask a liar, the response will be: "He would say to take the north road. ... This is the case for any proposition P whose subject is the world. ECONIS-Datenbank der ZBW - results/shortlist lhzbw.gbv.de/DB=1/LNG=DU/LRSET=2/SET=2/.../CNA?... Translate this page Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth-tellers : who are the ... A resource-based analysis of realized knowledge relatedness in diversified firms
