دانلود رایگان مقاله لاتین شاخص سلامت روان در کار از سایت الزویر
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
تنظیم شناختی به عنوان شاخص سلامت روان در کار: توسعه و اعتبار سنجی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Cognitive adjustment as an indicator of psychological health at work: Development and validation of a measure
سال انتشار : 2016
برای دانلود رایگان مقاله شاخص سلامت روان در کار اینجا کلیک نمایید.
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی:
3. Measurement of CAW
Despite the significant amount of documentation that is available on adjustment at work, different problems affect the quality of the measurement of cognitive adjustment indicators. These problems relate to the content and the validation of these scales. Table 1 offers a summary of the different tools listed [Table 1 near here]. 3.1. Content of the instruments In terms of content for the measures, there is relative confusion between CAW and the related constructs (i.e., Haueter et al., 2003; Morrison, 1993; Taormina, 2004). For example, task adjustment seems to be confused with task performance (i.e., Morrison, 1993). While task adjustment refers to the knowledge and skills needed to perform the required tasks of a job (Morton, 1994; Reio, 1998), task performance corresponds to behaviors such as those defined in a job description (Borman & Motowidlo, 1992). In this perspective, items such as “I rarely make mistakes when conducting my job assignments” translate into behaviors that have to do with performance more than they do with knowledge or skills relative to the task. In addition to the confusion between adjustment and performance, one of the scales confuses antecedents and adjustment indicators (i.e., Taormina, 2004). The following item: “This organization has provided excellent job training for me” is an example of a strategy that has been documented as leverage to support adjustment (Bauer et al., 2007; Saks et al., 2007). Finally, some authors have discarded the relational component of the measurement (i.e., Haueter et al., 2003). Yet, interpersonal interactions would be an essential component of adjustment for theorists of organizational socialization (e.g., Feldman, 1981; Fisher, 1986). In light of these observations, it would be beneficial to re-examine the measurement of adjustment based on conceptual grounds. 3.2. Validation of instruments While most of the scales have only been validated based on reliability and exploratory factor analyses (i.e., Chao, O'Leary-Kelly, Wolf, Klein, & Gardner, 1994; Morrison, 1993; Morton, 1994; Reio, 1998), only two of the instruments (i.e., Haueter et al., 2003; Taormina, 2004) were tested with confirmatory factor analyses. The three dimensions of the first instrument (i.e., Haueter et al., 2003) were tested separately using three statistical models. This type of analysis does not allow for the measurement of adjustment as a unified construct as suggested by some authors and based on theoretical grounds (Hobfoll, 1989, 2001; Reio, 1998; Reio & Sutton, 2006), which forces one to use subscales of the tool independently from one another. Moreover, adjustment indices relating to the second instrument (i.e., Taormina, 2004) do not meet the standards generally allowed (Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2011; Marsh & Hocevar, 1985). Based on those conceptual and methodological considerations, Study 1 aims to test a sound conceptualization and a measurement of CAW by examining the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1. . Exploratory factor analyses will group CAW measurement items into three factors, namely task adjustment, work group adjustment, and organizational adjustment. Hypothesis 2. . A second-order of CAW factor encompassing task adjustment, work group adjustment and organizational adjustment will provide a good fit to the data in the confirmatory factor analyses. Hypothesis 3. . The measure of CAW will emerge as being internally consistent (Hypothesis 3a; alpha over .70; Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 1993), similar to the task adjustment (Hypothesis 3b), work group adjustment (Hypothesis 3c), and organizational adjustment subscales (Hypothesis 3d). Hypothesis 4. . The factorial structure of the CAW measure will be invariant across time.
برای دانلود رایگان مقاله شاخص سلامت روان در کار اینجا کلیک نمایید.
کلمات کلیدی:
Marks and classroom adjustment as early indicators of mental health ... onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1007/BF00919756/pdf by G Spivack - 1987 - Cited by 11 - Related articles Analyses related school adjustment and academic performance in the early ... presence of negative coping behaviors are indicators of later mental health. Resilience and indicators of adjustment during rehabilitation from a ... psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-03250-003 by B White - 2010 - Cited by 142 - Related articles Driver, Simon: Department of Kinesiology, Health Promotion, and Recreation, ... *Adjustment; *Rehabilitation; *Resilience (Psychological); *Spinal Cord Injuries; ... Arenas of Comfort in Adolescence: A Study of Adjustment in Context https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1135682178 Jeylan T. Mortimer, Kathleen T. Call - 2001 - Psychology Measures of Mental Health and Achievement The adjustment outcomes of ... For example, if certain indicators of self-esteem were more strongly related to a ... Searches related to adjustment as an indicator of psychological health psychological adjustment definition positive adjustment definition psychological adjustment definition pdf psychological adjustment theory psychological adjustment examples what is positive adjustment what is psychosocial adjustment positive adjustment accounting
