دانلود رایگان مقاله لاتین تحقیقات فراگیر ورزش از سایت الزویر
عنوان فارسی مقاله:
ورزش برای توسعه: تحقیقات فراگیر، بازخوانی و معنی دار در تنظیمات کم و متوسط درآمد
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Sport-for-development: Inclusive, reflexive, and meaningful research in low- and middle-income settings
سال انتشار : 2016
برای دانلود رایگان مقاله تحقیقات فراگیر ورزش اینجا کلیک نمایید.
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی:
2. Literature review
To explore the deeper meaning of a certain phenomenon, it is essential to follow a qualitative mode of inquiry (Bergold & Thomas, 2012; Denzin & Lincoln, 2003; Nicholls, Giles, & Sethna, 2010; Young & Atkinson, 2012). For example, Eisner (1985) argued that ‘‘truth’’ can only be achieved through flexibility, prioritizing the subjective over the objective, intuition over the rational, interpretation over measurement, and surprise over the predictable. In this context, the qualitative researcher is very much like an artist at various stages in the research process, who—in line with Weber’s concept of Verstehen—tries to establish an empathetic understanding1 to explore different realities and multiple truths. In the context of SFD, numerous studies have applied a variety of qualitative research techniques to investigate, monitor, or evaluate different sport-based development programs. These approaches have largely drawn on ‘‘traditional’’ qualitative methods, including interviews, participant observation, focus groups, document analysis, and, in some cases, a blend of these tools. In contrast, quantitative research designs (e.g., Armour, Sandford, & Duncombe, 2013; Bloodworth, McNamee, & Bailey, 2012; Chioqueta & Stiles, 2007) and mixed method approaches (e.g., Mammen & Faulkner, 2013; O’Brien & Ponting, 2013; Okada & Young, 2012) are less prominent in the current body of work. For the purpose of this article—which provides a reflection on our experiences in qualitative research in the Pacific islands region—we focus our review on previous qualitative research that has been conducted in the field. Here, we broadly distinguish between traditional approaches and participatory research, and focus on reflexivity as a foundation for conducting meaningful and locally relevant research, particularly in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings. 2.1. Traditional approaches in SFD research The majority of studies investigating SFD employ multiple methods; typically a combination of interviews, focus groups, participant observation, and document analysis. For example, Okada and Young (2012) utilized open-ended interviews and participant observation to analyze the Siem Reap Hotel Football League in Cambodia. Similarly, Schulenkorf, Sugden, and Burdsey (2014) used interviewing techniques and focus group discussions to understand participant experiences of the Football for Peace program in Israel. Further applications of these traditional method combinations include interviews and focus groups (e.g., Gavin, McBrearty, & Harvey, 2013; Spaaij, Magee, & Jeanes, 2013; Welty Peachey, Cohen, Borland, & Lyras, 2013), interviews and participant observation (e.g., Gilchrist & Wheaton, 2011; Hill & Green, 2008; Intrator & Siegel, 2008; Ley & Rato Barrio, 2013; Light, 2010), and interviews and document analysis (e.g., Coatsworth & Conroy, 2007; Ekholm, 2013; MacIntosh & Spence, 2012). Larger research projects, including Masters and PhD theses, have typically utilised interviews, focus groups, participant observation and document analysis in a single study (see, for example, Cohen, 2013; Oliver, 2014; Schulenkorf, 2009). While this brief overview provides only a snapshot of the most common research methods in qualitative SFD work, it assists in highlighting a reliance on traditional methods and, arguably, a lack of methodological innovation in the field. This observation is supported by highly charged methodological debates within the SFD literature regarding the legitimacy and efficacy of research methodology; for example, Hayhurst (2015) contended that there is a history of inequality and colonialism imbued in SFD, which extends to the research context. She argued that there is a need to disrupt ‘‘conventional’’ research processes in this space to account for the complex social relations and nuanced sociocultural contexts in which SFD programmes are situated.
برای دانلود رایگان مقاله تحقیقات فراگیر ورزش اینجا کلیک نمایید.
کلمات کلیدی:
Sport for social development - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_for_social_development Sport for Social Development is a method of bringing about social change through the use of sports. In the U.S. this is commonly referred to as Sports-Based ... Sports for development: more than just fun and games? | Global ... https://www.theguardian.com › World › Impact and effectiveness Aug 10, 2015 - The London 2012 Olympics popularised the use of sport to create social good, but many organisations in this nascent sector have yet to create ... Expertise. Sport for Development - GIZ https://www.giz.de/expertise/html/9911.html Sport can make a major contribution to promoting and educating children and young people: it teaches them about fairness and tolerance, boosts their ... Sport for Development and Peace | The Commonwealth thecommonwealth.org/sport-development-and-peace The Commonwealth Secretariat advocates for sport to be used as a vehicle for peace and development. We assist member countries to develop policies and ... Sport for Development and Peace - Right To Play International www.righttoplay.com/International/our-impact/Pages/SportforDevelopment.aspx A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt Learn more Searches related to Sport-for-development sports for development and peace sport for development jobs sport for development organizations sport for development programs sports for development projects united nations sport for development and peace jobs sport for development and peace organizations sports for development unicef
