دانلود رایگان مقاله لاتین پاسخ به ساموئلسون و هونیگ  از سایت الزویر


عنوان فارسی مقاله:

پاسخ به هونیگ و ساموئلسون (2014)


عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:

A response to Honig and Samuelsson (2014)



برای دانلود رایگان مقاله پاسخ به ساموئلسون و هونیگ  اینجا کلیک نمایید.





مقدمه انگلیسی مقاله:

1. Introduction

As part of an article in JBVi that discussed the importance of data replication and extension Honig and Samuelsson (2014) criticized the methodology in a paper I published on business planning in nascent ventures with Scott Shane in 2003 (Delmar and Shane, 2003). Honig and Samuelsson’s (2014) work is based on the partial replication and extension of two papers (Delmar and Shane, 2003; Honig and Karlsson, 2004) that reached opposite conclusions on the merits of business planning while both using the Swedish Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED). In this article, I seek to stimulate the discussion about testing theory using data from prevalent cohort design by highlighting some of Honig and Samuelsson’s (2014) misunderstanding of several key dimensions of such designs. I also discuss the methodological choices that Delmar and Shane (2003) made 15 years ago and how those choices influenced our research results.1 The PSED is a prevalent or cross-sectional cohort design. Respondents are identified through a range of questions that ensure they are in the process of starting a new venture. The first wave of interviews is therefore a cross-sectional sample of people who are in the process of starting a business. These respondents are then followed and sampled repeatedly over time. This design is different from an incident cohort design, for which respondents and units are identified when they experience their first critical milestone or conception time. From that point on, units are followed over time or until they reach a terminal outcome (e.g., venture termination). Drawing accurate inference from a prevalent cohort design depends on the correct approach to analyzing such data



برای دانلود رایگان مقاله پاسخ به ساموئلسون و هونیگ  اینجا کلیک نمایید.






کلمات کلیدی:

Models of Start-up Thinking and Action: Theoretical, Empirical, and ... https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1786354853 2016 - ‎Business & Economics A response to Honig and Samuelsson (2014). Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3, 1À4. Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate ... Researching Entrepreneurship: Conceptualization and Design https://books.google.com/books?isbn=3319266926 Per Davidsson - 2016 - ‎Business & Economics Entrepreneurial behavior and business performance. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. Delmar, F. (2015). A response to Honig and Samuelsson ... Most Cited Journal of Business Venturing Insights Articles - Elsevier https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing.../most-cited-articles Replication in entrepreneurship research: A further response to Delmar. Volume 3, Issue , January 2015, Pages 30-34. Benson Honig | Mikael Samuelsson. Recent Journal of Business Venturing Insights Articles - Elsevier https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing.../recent-articles A response to Honig and Samuelsson (2014). July 2015. Frédéric Delmar. Honig and Samuelsson (2014) recently published an article in this outlet criticizing ... Journal of Business Venturing Insights - Elsevier www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights/?start... Journal of Business Venturing Insights (JBV Insights) aims to enhance the conversation among scholars and practitioners by offering a forum for rapid...